![]() |
|
|
Further south, in the far-away Yemen, where the Empire’s hold was tenuous and the hereditary ruler of the region, Imam Yahya, who was also enjoying the support of the Shiite population had revolted. In 1910, he declared a holy war against the Ottoman Empire. The government responded by sending a major force under the command of Ahmet İzzet Paşa. Major İsmet Bey (later İsmet İnönü) wrote in his memoirs that Ahmet İzzet Paşa obtained the support of local sheiks and ordered an offensive against the rebels. It has then taken only ten days to reach and San’a, but it would take several months more to clean off all of Yemen. According to İsmet Bey, the main opponent of the Ottoman forces was not Imam Yahya but an outbreak of cholera. After a series of battles during 1911, the two sides decided for a peace. Imam Yahya was to keep his autonomy as well as his religious and political influence and he would receive financial concessions as well. In return, no guns were to be fired in Yemen. |
Upon entering the war, the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, Mehmet Reşad, who was at the same time the Caliph of all Muslims in the world, issued a “jihad”, holy war, against the Triple Entente. Since 1913, the government was resorting on Islamic propaganda in the Arab provinces and with the call for jihad now all Muslims were asked to fight together with the Sultan’s troops. The jihad was not meant to pit the Muslims of the world against Christian powers, since the Ottoman Empire was itself allied with two of them, Germany and Austria-Hungary. Rather, as Hasan Kayalı wrote, it was “designed to increase domestic support for the government’s war efforts and to provide an obstacle to the Entente’s mobilization campaign”. The Entente's campaign as mentioned by Kayalı included British efforts to increase its influence on Arab tribes and to motivate them to fight against the Ottoman Empire. |
|
Cemal Paşa Arrives In December 1914, Cemal Paşa undertook the command of the Fourth Army in Damascus and began to prepare his expedition on the Suez Canal. He asked Hussein to participate in this expedition in command of his Bedouin forces. Hussein was hesitant; he did not commit himself, but pledged to send units under the command of his son Sharif Ali. In February 1915, as Cemal was moving towards Suez, taking with the bulk of Ottoman forces stationed in Hejaz, Hussein assured Enver Paşa that he would protect the Caliph’s (i.e. the Ottoman Sultan’s) interests in the holy places, as long as attacks on his own position are not tolerated. By that time, the person whom Hussein saw as the main source of such attacks, Vehib Bey, was appointed as the commander of the Third Army in the Caucasus and left Hejaz. Cemal’s expedition to the Suez Canal ended in disappointment and as soon as he was back in Damascus, in May 1915, he was granted emergency powers. Having found “evidence” about dissident activities of Arab opponents in the French consulates in Beirut and Damascus that were closed down, Cemal Paşa began to prosecute Arab cultural and political leaders. A Francophile Maronite priest was publicly executed for treason against the Empire, and this was followed by trial at the military court in Aleyh (TR: Aliye) of eleven Beiruti leaders, who were hanged on 21 August 1915 in the town square. |
|
However, it would be wrong to say that the Turks were in total negligence of Hussein’s aims. The Ottoman governor in Medina, Basri Paşa was sending reports stating that he is suspicious of Sharif Ali, who is openly involved in anti-Ottoman propaganda among the tribes, and he believes that the good-will shown by the Sharifs is nothing but a cover up aimed at winning time. Similarly, Cemal Paşa was also anticipating that things could go wrong in Hejaz and the Sharifs were not to be trusted. For this reason, he sent Fahreddin Paşa, commander of the XII Corps to Medina. Late he would write in his memoirs: “According to an article in Temps newspaper, Sharif Hussein had made a deal with the British as early as 1 January 1916 and he waiting for an opportunity to declare his revolt. At that time, if I had been aware of the situation, I would immediately have Sharif Faisal arrested in Damascus and Sharif Ali arrested in Medina. I would even send a Turkish division to Mecca to detain Sharif Hussein and his other sons. In that way I could have this cursed rebellion suppressed before it even broke out. However, I had no concrete evidence whatsoever to prove the wrongdoings of these traitors.” |
The situation was worsening, both in Palestine and in Hejaz. The Arab rebels were supported by the British, who in October 1916 sent an officer to work with the Arabs. This man was Captain T.E. Lawrence. Lawrence obtained assistance from the British fleet to repulse Ottoman attack on Yenbo in December 1916. He also convinced Arab leaders (i.e. Hussein’s sons Faisal and Abdullah) to co-ordinate their actions in support of British strategy and to focus on the Hejaz Railway instead of the city of Medina. On 3 January 1917, Faisal’s forces began an advance northward along the Red Sea coast towards Wejh (TR: Elvecih). The Ottoman garrison in the city could resist only for two days and had to withdraw towards Medina. |
|
By early 1917, Arab rebels had won the upper hand in the Arabian Peninsula. They were not only superior in numbers, but they had established an effective logistics system for carrying food and water as well. On the other side, Turks were retreated to a defensive position in Medina with small detachments scattered along the Hejaz Railway. Given the desperateness of the situation Enver Paşa and Cemal Paşa decided to evacuate Hejaz and concentrate on Palestine. But emotionally, it was not an easy thing to abandon the holy cities of Islam, which had been under Ottoman control for almost four centuries. Sultan Mehmet Reşad, supported by Talat Paşa and Fahreddin Paşa, managed to persuade Enver and Cemal on this matter. The final decision was to stay in Hejaz and to defend Medina at all costs. Only the sick and wounded were to leave and they would take with themselves the holy relics of Islam to Istanbul. Other than those, the army was to stay and fight. Another person to leave Medina, for security reasons, was the Emir of Mecca, Sharif Haydar, who left on 14 March 1917. Defending Medina Medina was under siege. Sharif Abdullah had established his headquarters near Medina and he was blocking the roads leading to the city, so that the Turks could receive no supplies or reinforcements. The remaining Turkish forces were doing their best defend the city as well as stations along the railway, which were under the attack of Arab camel cavalry, supported by the British, who were inflicting damages on Turkish positions. Lawrence was not only providing strategic support for the Arabs, he was also contacting the tribes, which had remained outside the revolt, and recruiting them by paying them in gold. |
|
|
|
Fahreddin Paşa was not willing to abandon Medina. He did not give a negative reply to the government, but tried to gain some time. He received the same order again twice, on 28 November through a cable by the new Minister of War Cevat Paşa and on 8 December through a courier, Captain Ziya Bey, who brought the order in person. On 27 December, he gathered all of his staff for a meeting. The camp was divided. Some of the officers were determined to follow Fahreddin Paşa and stay in Medina, whereas others, led by Lt.Col. Emin Bey, were thinking that resistance was futile and they had to follow the government’s orders in order to minimize losses. They could achieve no agreement. On 5 January 1919, Col. Ali Necip Bey, commander of the 58th Division, visited Fahreddin Paşa. He told him that as the commander of the forces in Medina, he has the final word on the issue of surrender, and the officers have decided that they would do whatever he orders them to do. However, Ali Necip Bey added, none of them could really see any solution other than surrender. After long discussions, Fahreddin Paşa agreed. On 7 January, more than two months after the armistice, the representatives of Turkish, Arab and British forces signed an agreement on the “Evacuation of Medina and the Evacuation of Ottoman Forces to Coastal Regions and Their Homelands”. |
|
Turks surrendered in Medina a total of 654 officers, 6,000 men, 30,000 rifles, 75 machines guns and 22 artillery guns of different sizes. Fahreddin Paşa, his officers and the Turkish troops remaining in the city were all sent to prisoner camps in Cairo, in violation of the armistice signed with Arabs and the British. After the war, Cemal Paşa wrote in his memoirs that the Arab Revolt spelled disaster on the Arab world and Sharif Hussein, who was after his own ambitions, was a traitor to Arabs and Muslims. Several contemporary historians come close to this argument. Efraim and Inair Karsh, for example, argue that “Hussein was no champion of national liberation seeking to unshackle the Arab Nation from the chains of Ottoman captivity: he was an imperialist aspirant anxious to exploit a unique window of opportunity for substituting his own empire for that of the Ottomans.” Similarly, Philip Robins wrote that Hussein “eschewed Islamic solidarity of the Ottoman Empire in favor of dynastic ambition.” |
Today in Turkey the recollection of the Arab Revolt is still intense in the minds of Turks, who most often express their views of this issue by stating “the Arabs have stabbed us in the back.” However, one should be careful at this point, given the gap between the historical perception and the facts. It should be remembered as well that none of the Arab units of the Ottoman Army defected to Sharif Hussein and nor did any notable political or military figure of Arab origin joined him. The majority of Arabs remained loyal to the ideological foundation of the Ottoman Empire, which was, in Robin’s words, “loyalty to the centre in the name of Islam.” |
Karsh, E. and Karsh, I., "Myth in the Desert, or Not the Great Arab Revolt", in Middle Eastern Studies, 33:2, pp.267-312, 1997. Özyüksel, M., “Hicaz Demiryolu” (Hijaz Railway), Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, Istanbul, 2000. Robins, P., "Suits and Uniforms: Turkish Foreign Policy Since the Cold War",London: Hurst&Company, 2003.
|
|
Turkeyswar.com / © Altay Atlı / This page is last updated on: 11.05.2009. |